All pictures and video reproduced and adapted with permission from Matteo Winkler and Laura Guidi.

Conference Queer Kinship: Affects, Families, Bonds (9-10 April 2024, University for Foreigners of Siena)

Marica delivered a keynote speech on Dancing Queer Kinship and the Law. Her presentation discussed how to re-imagine family and kinship as legal categories, in particular in the context of disputes and conflicts involving queer people, through dance. Drawing upon the intersection between Isadora Duncan’s, Maurice Bejart’s, and Martha Graham’s approaches to dancing, legal dancing, dispute resolution discourse and queer theory, Marica queered her keynote by combining words and dance while delivering her presentation, and by involving the audience in interpretative dancing. As part of her presentation, she presented the Queer Judgments Project as a seminal example of legal dancing that – by celebrating emotions, relationships, bodies, and freedom – can enhance the rights of queer people. Marica encouraged participants to listen to the recording of Nuno's voice while reading the Queer Judge poem and asked them to improvise and translate into movements their perception of the queer judge.... six, seven, eight, everyone can dance!

QJP panel at SLSA 2024

QJP co-ordinators Nuno Ferreira and Maria Moscati co-chaired a panel discussion at the Socio-legal Studies Association annual conference 2024, held at the University of Portsmouth, 26-28 March 2024 ( The panel explored the work carried out so far in the project. Panel contributors introduced the project's aims, activities, methods and outputs, and presented their contributions to the forthcoming edited collection of re-written queer judgments (Counterpress, 2024). Speakers covered examples from international, European and domestic (India, Kenya and UK) jurisdictions,  relating to topics such as same-sex marriage, air traffic noise pollution, asylum on grounds of sexual orientation, and the criminalization of sexual acts between consenting adult queer persons.


Rafael Carrano Lelis (presenting) and Paula Gerber – ‘Joslin et al. v. New Zealand (United Nations Human Rights Committee, 2002): Queering the UN Human Rights Committee’

Kay Lalor – ‘Hatton v the United Kingdom (ECtHR, 2003): Queering Environmental Protections’

Alex Powell – ‘HJ (Iran) & HT (Cameroon) (UK, 2010): Queer Reflections on a Landmark Case on the Rights of LGBT+ Refugees’

Yerram Raju Behara (presenting), Malhar Satav and Sal, ‘Queering Section-377 Litigations (India, 2018): Drawing Marginalized Queer-Trans Narratives and Perspectives into the Supreme Court & High Court Verdicts’ [online]

Waruguru Gaitho, ‘Petition 150 & 234 of 2016 (consolidated) (Kenya, 2019): The Potent Possibilities of Dissent – Towards a Renegade Judicial Praxis’ [online]

Poetry and Dance of The Queer Judge

To view and download a PDF of the presentation, please use this link.

All pictures and video reproduced and adapted with permission from Liam Davis.

Dr Sen Raj was a George Flannery Visiting Fellow at Sydney Law School in 2024

As part of his fellowship, Dr Raj shared highlights from the Queer Judgments Project. He discussed the creative, ethical, critical, and political practices of queer judgment writing and encouraged others to get involved in the project. Sen offered a talk at the Sydney Institute of Criminology.

"Over the past three years, I have been co-leading (with Professor Nuno Ferreira and Dr Maria Moscati) a collaboration of scholars, lawyers, and activists around the world called the Queer Judgments Project. This project invites scholars, activists, and legal practitioners to re-imagine and re-create judgments relating to minoritised, non-normative sexual and gendered communities. Building on critical judgments initiatives like Feminist Judgments: From Theory to Practice, this project plays with legal form and legal norms to shape judgments that prioritise the safety, freedom, and wellbeing of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, queer, and asexual (LGBTIQA) people. In this seminar, I will discuss the process of critical judgment writing using the example of R v Green (a case infamous for legitimising the ‘homosexual advance defence’ in NSW). While that case has been the subject of much academic and community criticism for excusing lethal violence against gay men and has since been superseded by statutory reform, my re-written judgment draws out the different expressions of fear, anxiety, and disgust in that case to jurisprudentially rethink questions of sexual harm, institutionalised homophobia, and criminal responsibility. The work of critical judgment writing from a ‘queer’ perspective is important for legal academics and practitioners who are engaging with questions of social justice and are interested in alternative ways of litigating, judging, and reforming law."

Redefining Queerscapes - Rewriting Queerscapes through Poetry

QJP contributor Raju Behara has led on a social action project that has included panel discussions and workshops that have generated poems and other forms of art. Here you can find some of the outcomes of this project. Their journey through The YP Foundation’s EQUAL fellowship can be accessed here. If you'd like to find out more about this project, please contact Raju on

The first set of poetry workshops were conducted at ŪRU - a Queer Village, a queer camping festival conceptualised and produced by Prasanna Pichai in partnership with Out & About, at Wayanad Kerala 

The second set of poetry workshops were conducted as a Pre-Pride event, during Namma Pride 2022. The poster is below:

Activity 1 of the workshops: What do safe spaces mean to you as a queer-trans individual? Participants of the workshop were encouraged to explore what safe spaces means to them in the first set of activities, which involved free form writing and sketching. These are some of the artistic outputs:

Activity 2 of the workshops: Using Blackout and Erasure poetry to redefine queer-trans lived experiences in housing, healthcare and workplaces, pre and post Section-377 Litigations

The letters and other texts used by the workshop participants in the project for blackout and erasure poetry can be found here:*

*The project utilised first-person narratives from publicly available sources for this exercise, which includes: 

Articles and Poems sourced from Gaysi This platform is a space for expression and dialogue about queer sensibilities in South Asia. A place for sharing thoughts, activism, dreams, theories, confessions, and desires.

Essays sourced from Less than Gay: A citizen's report on the status of homosexuality in India, developed by AIDS Bhedbav Virodhi Andolan.

Some of the artistic outputs generated through erasure are below:

Activity 3 of the workshops: Using found poetry to reimagine what safe spaces to us as queer-trans individuals, in the backdrop of the imagery and texts accessed in activity 2, and through the lens of safe spaces, defined in activity 1. Some of the poems generated in this activity are below. 

Poems from ŪRU workshops:

Poem 1 Loving my Job

How can I love my job?

Sounds frantic, nothing heretic,

Setting sun floods the west faced boardroom,

Long table chairs around

No damsel or knight to be found,

Whence cometh my love for this.

Circular rectangle?

Country Director & Intern.

Same table, same circle.

Floor complete with grassroot changemakers & 

Ceiling with upper echelons of policy makers

Or is it the other way around.?

We talk for hours about

Dalits dying in sewers &

Trans people from AIDS

Teacher absenteeism,

like justice in the lives of the oppressed.

Power by, Hunger, Trauma

Beyond number

What a sad affair?

We win subtly and fail gloriously,

Broken people and broken systems

Sitting on broken chairs,

Yet I'm in love,

With the power, and

Nowhere to take cover.

A place as strong as bullets & safe as pillows,

The fears, the tears,

And listening ears.

Power in empathy,

They love me out of my misery.

Poems from Namma Pride workshops:

Poem 1

I feel like crying

Muffled sounds filter through me,

Stubbornly resisting

She, trying to thrust me out

We stain against each other


Pain is non-linear

Love is a chaotic system

Multi variable, insane

A vital gift


Fear (t)

Fear (love, t)

Fear (pain, love, t)

Fucking Frightening


Poem 2

Pride with a girl

Pride with a boy

The hour gets dark.

With Pride I toy


I try a bit hard

Right from the start

But as dust falls

I collapse as cards.


Flowers & Prayers,

And pout up & sex

Never seen summer

With winter I`m struck.


Don’t with hesitation, Ma

This constant agitation, Ma

Into the galaxy of endless perhaps,

Trending as stars, not gonna relapse.


My identity is informal ma,

As resistant & moral ma

Sorry I couldn't be more normal ma

Sorry I couldn't be more normal ma

Panel Discussion 

This was the final activity of the pilot social action project which included conversations centred around the legal entitlements and barriers to access them with NGOs and Policy Think-tanks.

Celebrating our first Queer Judgments Project presentation - March 2022

Flick Adams and Dr Fabienne Emmerich of Keele University presented on "Foreclosing Possibilities of Queer Love, Relations of Care, and Solidarity: Deconstructing Hopkins v Sodexo and the Protection of the Heteronormative Institutional Order". 

You can address any queries to and

To view and download a PDF of the presentation, please use this link. 

Focusing on the Edited Collection, February 2022

The Queer Judgments Project held two workshops to discuss project priorities, with the focus on creating an edited collection. We now have over 70 contributors, each focusing on re-writing and analyzing a different legal judgment pertaining to the lives of queer individuals from around the world. 

Scoping workshops, October 2021

We held further workshops in October 2021 to discuss the project outputs and goals. We established a list of official contributors and honed in on written and creative outputs of the project. 

At these workshops, we also addressed several theoretical questions:

1. How does legality reflect colonial power structures?

2. What kind of queer subjects does the law imagine? 

3. Are we seeking legality?

4. What are the consequences of being stigmatised?

5. In what ways does the law think about the queer subject and how queer subjects position themselves in relation to the law?

We also addressed some methodological questions:

1.How deep does our knowledge of the judgment have to be?

2.How can evidence be queered to become accessible? 

3.How can we queer the files that judges have access to?

At these workshops, fellow queer scholars and activists spoke passionately about issues ranging from reimagining the decriminalisation of homosexuality to making room for the experiences of LGBTIQ+ people who seek asylum, to rethinking modes of legal gender recognition, to dismantling carceral systems harming socially marginalised populations, etc. The various topics discussed spanned jurisdictions, court hierarchies, and subdisciplines of law.

Scoping workshops, July 2021 

In July 2021, we held two scoping workshops to bring together queer scholars and activists to reflect on jurisprudential challenges related to SOGIESC matters. In framing this conversation, we were not tied to specific SOGIESC-related rights issues or subdisciplines of law or styles of jurisprudence. We wanted to create an open space which gave people the opportunity to identify some of the pressing legal, scholarly, and activist concerns relating to SOGIESC-related rights and to work out what a ‘queer judgments project’ might offer to our collective work to improve SOGIESC-related rights globally. To that end, we asked those interested in the conversation to reflect on the following questions:

1. How might queer judgments be relevant to your work (as a lawyer, scholar, activist, etc)? 

2. What jurisdictional andjurisprudential scope should the project have?

 3. What theoretical perspectives should inform such a project? 

4. What form should “queer judgments” take? 

5. What (scholarly, political, artistic) outputs could we develop together? 

6. How might we resource this work?

We had over 30 people from different parts of the world join the initial (virtual) dinner-table conversation to discuss these questions. The discussions that took place online were enormously rich. 

What became clear from the conversation is that the Queer Judgments Project would not just be a “typical” academic edited collection. Rather, people were interested inoffering critical commentaries through writing and podcasts, re-writing judgments, experimenting with legal form, queering legal interventions by theatricalising them or turning them into comics, and collaborating with activists and artists to rethink the limits and possibilities of law when it comes to SOGIESC issues or the lives of LGBTIQ+ people.

We need your consent to load the translations

We use a third-party service to translate the website content that may collect data about your activity. Please review the details and accept the service to view the translations.